1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
7nadin3 [17]
3 years ago
8

Hãy so sánh sự khác biệt cơ bản của phong trào giải phóng dân tộc ở các nước châu á với các nước ở khu vực Mĩ Latinh trước và sa

u năm 1945
History
1 answer:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
5 0
Khác biệt cơ bản đầu tiên là mục tiêu đấu tranh

- Trước 1945: các nước ở châu Á và Mĩ Latinh đấu tranh giành độc lập

- Sau 1945:

+ Châu Á: đấu tranh lật đổ sự bóc lột và nô dịch của đế quốc thực dân.
=> Kết quả: Một số nước giành được độc lập, phát triển đất nước...

+ Mĩ Latinh: đấu tranh chống chế độ thực dân kiểu mới, chế độ độc tài thân Mỹ.
=> Kết quả: Chính quyền độc tài nhiều nước bị lật đổ, chính phủ dân tộc, dân chủ được thiết lập.
You might be interested in
Which of the following would create stability in the U.S. economy?
Andrew [12]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

im sorry if i get it wrong but i am pretty sure like 99%

4 0
3 years ago
What was true about the 13 amendment
shutvik [7]

Answer:

The 13th amendment, which formally abolished slavery in the United States, passed the Senate on April 8, 1864, and the House on January 31, 1865. On February 1, 1865, President Abraham Lincoln approved the Joint Resolution of Congress submitting the proposed amendment to the state legislatures. The necessary number of states ratified it by December 6, 1865. The 13th amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

In 1863 President Lincoln had issued the Emancipation Proclamation declaring “all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” Nonetheless, the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation. Lincoln recognized that the Emancipation Proclamation would have to be followed by a constitutional amendment in order to guarantee the abolishment of slavery.

The 13th amendment was passed at the end of the Civil War before the Southern states had been restored to the Union and should have easily passed the Congress. Although the Senate passed it in April 1864, the House did not. At that point, Lincoln took an active role to ensure passage through congress. He insisted that passage of the 13th amendment be added to the Republican Party platform for the upcoming Presidential elections. His efforts met with success when the House passed the bill in January 1865 with a vote of 119–56.

With the adoption of the 13th amendment, the United States found a final constitutional solution to the issue of slavery. The 13th amendment, along with the 14th and 15th, is one of the trio of Civil War amendments that greatly expanded the civil rights of Americans.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Please help
sashaice [31]

Braddock was working at the docs and his broken hand prevented him from working consistently.

5 0
3 years ago
The Senate and House each sets its own rules, disciplines its own members, and can expel a member with a a two-thirds vote.
Vinil7 [7]

The United States Constitution (Article I, Section 5, Clause 2) provides that "Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member."

8 0
3 years ago
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Mashcka [7]

Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.

<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.

The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Jefferson and Madison opposed Hamilton’s economic plan because they believed the federal government should use only those powers
    11·2 answers
  • What is a significant difference between the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies?
    15·2 answers
  • Which is one of the four basic principles of the 1628 petition of right?
    10·2 answers
  • How interest in ancient texts led to demands for Church reform
    7·1 answer
  • Why did French aristocrats and some affranchis decide to leave Haiti after its independence? A. They were forced to leave by the
    6·2 answers
  • The Roman Empire had __________ where the leaders were elected to speak for the people. Please just give me the answer I'm runni
    12·2 answers
  • Why will CJ not let the crew into the Oval Office?
    9·1 answer
  • Keeping Order. Paul has been convicted of
    13·1 answer
  • What is one way the Aztec society is similar to today's society​
    5·1 answer
  • Which concept was put forth by W.E.B. Du Bois?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!