Answer:
c. tolerance
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various professionals, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of tolerance. This happens when a toxin is introduced to the body various times, the body begins to develop a sort of immunity to that toxin and is able to tolerate it without having the same effects like before.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The correct answer is C) It limits the government's power through listing its responsibilities and including a bill of rights.
The branches don't answer to the president while it is indeed final authority so it's not A or B. Major legislative policy changes don't always get passed with majority rule do to things such as vetoes or similar.
Answer:
C.) how the south consistently votes democratic
Explanation:
1.Research:Explore the websites provided to gather information on two landmark Supreme Court cases in order to compare the arguments for and against judicial restraint and judicial activism.
2.Write:Write an essay that compares and contrasts judicial activism and judicial restraint and presents your opinion on the debate surrounding these two philosophies.To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.Use the provided websites to conduct research and answer the questions below. Your research will be critical to gathering the information necessary to write your essay. This section is worth 8 points.
1. Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial restraint is where the judge limits the exercise of their own power and it comes into play when thejudge defers the issue to an elected official in the legislative or executive branches.
2. Explain judicial activism and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial activism is where the judge decides based on his/her opinion of what is best. These kinds of situations often occur when the judge tries to protect individual interests.
Info icon Subscribe to view the full document.
Subscribe to Unlock Right Arrow Icon
3. Explain the main arguments for and against judicial restraint. (1 point)For judicial restraintAgainst judicial restraintThe Constitution can only be interpreted by strict constructionist approachThe Constitution or laws made by legislature can be bague and be interpreted in different ways.
In some research, the researchers are not able to use random assignments to divide participants among groups. Instead, they compare preexisting groups, which results in a quasi-experimental design.
Random assignments are those which are given as a matter of chance to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all participants. Here participants forming multiple groups are with similar characteristics. So all groups are the same at the start of the experiment.
A quasi-experimental design applies a non-random method, and subjects are assigned to preexisting groups. There are some situations where true experiments can't be used for practical reasons. In such cases, a quasi-experimental design is a suitable tool.
To learn more about quasi experimental design here
brainly.com/question/28145500
#SPJ4
