500 divided by 60 = 8.33... (but you round it to 8)
it would take her about 8 minutes.
From the 3 options listed, both

in and

in could be measures found using a ruler with eighth inches marked, because those decimals can be written in terms of eighth fractions.

The other option,

in, is not a possibility because 0.1 cannot be written as a fraction of 8 that is marked on the ruler.
For this simulation, there are 5 numbers that we can draw. One of the numbers will result in seeing the groundhog. (1/5 or 0.20) To find the probability that Jay will see the groundhog 4 years in a row, we would use the following equation: 1/5•1/5•1/5•1/5
We would multiply the odds of getting a certain outcome by the number of time we want that outcome.
The odds that Jay will see the groundhog for the next for years is 0.0016, or .16%.
In hypothesis testing the claim that we have to test always goes into alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is negation of claim.
Here the claim to be tested is James bond can taste the difference between a martini that is shaken and one that is stirred.
So negation of this claim is James bond can not taste the difference between a martini that is shaken and one that is stirred.
So the null hypothesis for given experiment is
Null hypothesis: James bond can not taste the difference between a martini that is shaken and one that is stirred.
Alternative hypothesis: James bond can taste the difference between a martini that us shaken and one that is stirred.
I think 3/4 of would be 48 making 4/4 of x 64
Just do 16•3