1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiv31 [10]
2 years ago
15

1 point

History
1 answer:
Liono4ka [1.6K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

popular sovereignty

Explanation:

popular sovereignty is the only one that isn't correct

You might be interested in
What is the difference between slavery tolerated because of "necessity" and slavery affirmed as a "moral right"?
malfutka [58]

Slavery tolerated because of "necessity" means that you do not really want to do it, but you think you must do it. An example is when you have a farm and you need people to work on it. The trouble behind this scenario is that your farm isn’t making money to pay your farm helpers their proper wages, so you resort to slavery. In this case, you do not need money for salaries because your farm is doing well to keep your slaves clothed and fed.

Slavery affirmed as a "moral right" is when you think it is your right to be the master and the slaves deserves to be slaves.

6 0
3 years ago
How did the political party affect voter turnout when they were stronger
kvasek [131]
Voter turnout was very high
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In order to create lasting peace in Europe following World War I,
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

None of the mentioned

Explanation:

Woodrow Wilson proposed the Fourteen Points at the Paris Peace Conference because he felt sympathetic for the Germans because the rest of Europe was ripping them to shreds with new reparations and laws that were meant to punish Germany for starting WWI. But he never proposed any of the previously mentioned answers, yes he ratified them but that was only so that the Fourteen Point, the League of Nations would be ratified in the Treaty of Versaille.

8 0
3 years ago
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?
Mashcka [7]

Answer: A. The abolitionist movement grew stronger.

<em>Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)</em> was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It held that black people whose ancestors were imported into the U.S., whether enslaved of free, could not be American citizens. Therefore, they could not sue in federal court. Moreover, it ruled that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the territories acquired after the creation of the United States.

The decision was controversial, and greatly opposed by abolitionist groups. It strengthened the abolitionist movement and may have been a catalyst for the American Civil War.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What part of the American economy did not enjoy prosperity in the 1920s
Harlamova29_29 [7]
During the prosperity of the america during 1920, it is not well distributed. nearly half of its population still resides in the rural areas where there priary source of income is farimg
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Swahili Coast developed its own unique culture that
    15·2 answers
  • What were the justifications for American Imperialism?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Mao Zedong launch the Great Leap Forward in 1958?
    8·2 answers
  • _____, named after a fourth century theologian, is a belief that denies that Jesus was equal to God the Father and denies the Ho
    15·2 answers
  • List three characteristics of the free enterprise system
    14·1 answer
  • What are the three motives for terrorism
    6·1 answer
  • Plz Help ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • What were the positive and negative effects of british rule on indians?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was African slavery introduced to the Americas? The Spanish needed slaves to work the sugar plantations in America. A potato
    6·1 answer
  • I’ll mark brainlist
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!