Answer:
"Maycomb was an old town, but it was a tired old town when I first knew it. In rainy weather the streets turned to red slop; grass grew on the sidewalks, the courthouse sagged in the square. Somehow it was hotter then: a black dog suffered on a summers day; bony mules hitched to Hoover carts flicked flies in the sweltering shade of the live oaks on the square. Men's stiff collars wilted by nine in the morning. Ladies bathed before noon, after their three-o'clock naps, and by nightfall were like soft teacakes with frostings of sweat and sweet talcum."
Explanation: it is Chapter 1 - 31
Hello. The article was not provided and I could not get a copy of it online. However, to help you understand the purpose of the information in the article;
- Study the author's choice of words and vocabulary.
An article could be informative, argumentative, persuasive, or expository. An informative text is one where the author simply provides facts and details about a subject. His personal opinion on them is not included.
In argumentative texts, he seeks to prove a point. He defends his side of the argument against the opposing view. A persuasive text seeks to convince the audience about a perspective.
An expository text informs the audience and contains an opinion from the author.
So, to arrive at an answer, study the author's choice of words and deduce his general aim of writing the article.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/2289953
If a country conducted a thorough evaluation of its environmental impacts and found that it is consuming resources at a 3.0 planet rate, it means:
- The country needs to reduce its resource consumption by two thirds in order to be sustainable.
- The rate mentioned above refers to <u>how fast we </u><u>consume </u><u>what the </u><u>planet </u><u>has to offer.</u>
- If a country consumes resources at a 3.0 rate, that means the it is consuming <u>3 times faster</u> than what the planet can produce, so to speak.
- To be sustainable, the country needs to reduce consumption by two thirds. That way, its "speed" would be the same as the planet's.
- In other words, the country would consume what the planet can offer at the moment. It wouldn't consume what future generations will need.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/22395115
