<span>New Hampshire.Massachusetts Bay Colony.Rhode Island.<span>Connecticut.
i dont know if this is right or not but hope it helps</span></span>
Answer:
In 1670, there was not a country called the United States of America, but there was only a collection of British colonies which weren´t free; they were under the authority of England´s crown. In 1860, the USA was a well established independent and democratic country, despite the deep political and social divisions of the time that would lead to the Civil War. The nation had its Constitution, citizens´rights (it is true not all people could enjoy them because of slavery) and separation of powers. There were regular elections for president and Congress. Unfortunately, the democratic progress of the USA did not benefit all on an equal basis in the 19th century and good part of the 20th century. Even after the Civil War, the passing of the 14th Amendment and other laws, real legal equality was not achieved. Southern states approved legislation that impeded the effective use of African American rights to vote. So, democratic evolution hasn´t always generated benefits to all, but there´s been significant improvement since the 1960s.
Explanation:
There were two capital cities in the Kingdom of Kush. During the height of Kush's dominance, Napata functioned as the capital. Around 590 BCE, the capital was relocated to the city of Meroe. Meroe was further south, offering a greater buffer from Egypt's warfare.
<em>In other words...</em>
In 590 BCE, the Kingdom of Kush relocated its capital to the city of Meroe for protection. Until the time of King Arkamani I, the rulers of Meroe continued to imitate Egyptian custom and dress, as well as Egyptian policy and religious practice (also known as Ergamenes, 295-275 BCE).
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, because if there wasn't a leader, things would not go well
