This explanation and his theory were not widely accepted. Prior to Wegener, however, many had noted that the shapes of the continents seem to fit together, suggesting some schism in the past.
<span>Continental drift was really not allowable as even an accepted theory until the 1950s. Most geologists accepted the theory as quite possible before 1970. Several factors point to the acceptance of the continental drift theory. </span>
<span>Fossil records from separate continents, particularly on the outskirts of continents show the same species. As well mineral specimens along the supposed break lines of the continents are nearly identical. Some identical species exist on certain continents, like an earthworm common to both Africa and South America suggesting the species could not have spontaneously arisen on both continents without some variations hope this helps</span>
The correct answer is: B) supply energy, primarily in the form of ATP, for the cell's work
There are two main types of metabolic reactions:
1. Catabolic reactions (catabolism) are reactions of molecule breakage-macromolecules are broken down to basic units (monomers) and energy in the form of ATP is released. Formed monomers are used for the synthesis of new molecules or are released as waste.
2. Anabolic reactions (anabolism) are reactions of synthesis or building up of the macromomolecules. Anabolic reactions require energy, which means that are endergonic process and that energy is powered by catabolic reactions.
Answer:
Please find the difference between correlation and causation in the explanation section
Explanation:
Correlation and causation are two mistaken terms during data analysis and conclusion, however, these two terms mean different things.
Correlation shows that two variables relate to one another. In other words, two variables are said to CORRELATE if a relationship exists between them. For example, a correlation exists between sales of radios and sales of batteries because they are related.
On the other hand, causation describes how one variable's action causes an effect in the other variable. In other words, the one variable causes the other. For example, There is causation between sales of radios and sales of batteries if the sales of radio causes the sales of batteries.
The difference between these two is that the correlation of two things does not mean causation. That is, two things might be related but does not cause one another. Note that , sales of radio and batteries in the first example does not mean one causes the other.
