The sentences that contain an example of ethos are number 1, 3 and 5.
As a rhetorical device, ethos is grounded in the speaker's credibility, honesty or authority to involve the audience.
In sentence number 1, the fact that Gizmotry and Gadgetry has been active for 140 years implies that it has a good service and has been able to adapt and evolve with the market, so it can offer a better service.
In sentence number 3, all customer orders are right, or they're free the example of ethos is present in the display of confidence and authority and work ethic to the point that assure the customer that in the rare case that the order is not right, he or she will not have to pay for it.
In sentence number 5, the fact that the person prescribing the medication is wearing a stethoscope implies that he or she is a doctor with the knowledge and authority to prescribe Barco's medication.
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
My students are not only intelligent but also...
d- make me laugh.
