1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cluponka [151]
2 years ago
11

What was the reasoning behind the addition of the 3/5 Compromise? What did the South want and why?

History
1 answer:
sweet [91]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise seemed to guarantee that the South would be strongly represented in the House of Representatives and would have disproportionate power in electing Presidents.

Southern states had wanted representation apportioned by population

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What problems can arise from the constitution’s elastic clause
andrey2020 [161]

Answer: i dont know sorry

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The main reason the attack at Pearl Harbor was so damaging is because at the time of the attack
solong [7]

Answer:

On the morning of December the 7th, 1941, Japan attacked Peral Harbor taking the United States forces by surprise, they were unprepared and the result of the attack was devastating, the MAIN reason the attack at Pearl Harbor was so damaging is because at the time of the attack most of the United States’ navy ships were at the harbor. The answer is A.

Explanation:

I've had this question in my history class :))

3 0
3 years ago
Pleasee helpp thank youu
Ghella [55]

Answer:

Dante Alighieri wrote The Divine Comedy

Geoffrey Chaucer wrote The Canterbury tales

Abbot Suger is related to the Gothic Style

And I am mostly sure that The Aristotelian Corpus is related to St. Thomas Aquinas.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!

3 0
3 years ago
What did the Prohibitory Act do?
Talja [164]
The answer is the last one, D. In retaliation to the creation of the Continental Army, Great Britain prohibited all trade with the colonies.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?
seraphim [82]

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone please help! It’s history. WWll stuff!
    10·2 answers
  • What was the most significant result of the Spanish colonization of central and South America
    5·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between art and history?
    12·1 answer
  • The Great Society programs of the 1960’s used the power of the Federal Government to bring about
    6·2 answers
  • In what ways did the colonies of Maryland and Pennsylvania serve as models of religious toleration during the colonial period? H
    7·2 answers
  • In what ways would the Scientific Revolution NOT be considered revolutionary.
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the main target of prosecution at the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal?
    13·2 answers
  • Who were some of the famous patriots involved in the First Continental Congress?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help i will give you brainliest timed test
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the Revolution radicalize? (3 major causes) (french revolution)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!