Answer:
The short answer is no. A country and even a system never just collapses at once; Rome for example collapsed over centuries. The Soviet Union fell because the American alliance system was better than what the Soviets imperial policy. The Soviets had to spend money to occupy that territory they gained after WW2 while America had no countries that did not cost much because they were politically independent but economically benefited from American trade (Japan, west Germany, south Korea compared to their counter parts of china, east Germany and North Korea for example).
It was also geography that helped each empire (empires aren't necessarily bad or formal) form. America was a maritime power with cheap transport costs and plenty of economic assets while Russia was a land power with rivers that froze and no warm water ports to connect to trade routes. When a country has to choose sides, they usually benefit more with the country that tries people in due to it's opportunities rather than the country that forces people to stay in their territory under the guise of the “people”.
Third problem was timing. Russia relied on high oil prices for their economic growth while America had a diviserfied economy. America wanted more producers of oil in a market and more countries producing stuff while the Soviets wanted only Russia producing anything. You can probably guess which was more popular and sustainable of these two options.
<em>I hope it helps you...</em>
<em>this is written in my book..</em>
How did great statesmen such as Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster help keep national harmony?
Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster were three senators that dominated US politics in 1812. They were responsible for many compromises during a time of instability because of the issue of slavery. Clay was responsible for the Missouri Compromise and for the Compromise Tariff of 1833. Calhoun defended that the Federal Government should protect slavery so the southern states could feel comfortable staying in the Union. Daniel Webster accepted Calhoun’s proposal, he pleaded with northerners to accept the south state's demands for the sake of the Union.
Can there be true harmony when compromising on a moral issue such as slavery? Why or why not?
Today is not possible to comprehend true harmony with the moral issue as slavery. But morality was not an issue in that time and they opted to remain a Union than to deal with the slavery “problem”. The problem was that this issue became bigger and bigger until it became the main problem of the nation, leading to the Civil War. This way. Lincoln took the matter as the main problem and objective of the War.
Mainly poor immigrants new to America trying to get rich quick to make a better life for themselves and their families
Answer:
The correct answer is 4. The Hartford Convention led to the end of the Federalist Party.
Explanation:
The Hartford Convention was held in Connecticut between December 1814 and January 1815 by members of the Federalist Party. In said convention, these representatives discussed issues related to the War of 1812 and expressed their lack of support for the American cause and the total lack of meaning of said conflict, thus demonstrating their total antinomy towards the Democratic-Republican Party that was holding the presidency through James Madison.
It was a risky political move, with which the Federalists sought to win popular support to force an end to the war and a reconciliation with the British Empire. But this movement failed due to the American victory in the conflict, which led the Federalist Party to total discredit and to its loss of support at the popular level.
Answer:
Any or all of this
Explanation:
The Code provides the ethical framework that all member CPAs must adhere to. You are also subject to the ethics code imposed by your state – though most states adopt a code that’s identical, or at least similar, to the AICPA’s.
Most conduct code violations don’t result in revocation of CPA licenses by state boards of accountancy, which is the most severe penalty an accountant can face and is usually reserved for more egregious acts, such as fraud and other criminal activity. However, the AICPA and your state society have the authority to expel or suspend your membership if their investigation concludes that you violated a Code of Conduct rule.
This may result in any of this consequences: Suspension, monetary penalty or admonishment depending of the fault