Answer:
They woke up and smwlled the coffee
In other words they knew sokething was wrong
The purchase of Alaska from Russia.
Answer:In 1947, Salk took a position at University of Pittsburgh, where he began conducting research on polio, also known as infantile paralysis. By 1951, Salk had determined that there were three distinct types of polio viruses and was able to develop a "killed virus" vaccine for the disease.
Explanation:
Answer:
beginning, pushed by Stern, or only or only when he received the ring was he sure he haddone the right thing?Did Oskar ever really realize how much he had done?Okay I already answered this question in the other parts.Obviously we had to use it asthorough evidence for other questions.The things that Schindler saw that helped him understandthe horror of the situation were cruelty used during the liquidation of Krakow, the girl in redwandering among the violence, and seeing her dead, burnt body in the death camp.Oskar wasnot dedicated form the beginning.As I already answered before, he was selfish and only caredabout the prosperity of his business.He paid no mind to the injustice happening around him andwent about happily supporting the Nazi Party.I feel like he barely cared about the hints Sternwas giving him about wanting to help the Jews.But soon after he brushed that off is when heencountered the liquidation of Krakow and the girl in red.Then he began listening to Stern andmaking a begrudging effort.As time went by, he realised what he was actually doing.Savinglives and that’s when he went all in.He spent all of his money on Jews, even though Stern wastelling him how expensive it was going to be.I think Schindler felt like he was doing the rightthing but still doubted himself slightly. Receiving the ring at the end of the film was hisreassurance.That was another aha moment for him because he started realising what kind ofpower he had as a wealthy Nazi.He started pointing out all the luxuries he kept like jewelry,clothes, and his car.I don’t think he realised just how much he’d done.All he could think aboutis how much further he could’ve taken his efforts.Hopefully later in his life he realised thatthousands of descendents would live because of him
Answer:
04/12/2011
On this date, a century and a half ago, Confederate forces fired on Fort Sumter, on an island off the coast of South Carolina. The Confederate States of America asserted not only their right to secede but also to claim federal property within their borders. The newly inaugurated U.S. president, Abraham Lincoln, rejected both claims and refused to evacuate Sumter.
“Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy,” Lincoln had said in his somber inaugural address a month earlier. “A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism. Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or despotism in some form is all that is left.”
The Civil War, to Lincoln, was never technically a “war” but an illegal and unconstitutional rebellion and a fight to put down the rebellion. The details of the events leading to the firing on Fort Sumter have much to do with this attitude and with his total rejection of the possibility of secession.
By attempting to resupply Sumter, Lincoln succeeded in forcing the Confederacy to fire the first shots. Lincoln had to accept the loss of Sumter soon after. But he was successful, so to speak, in forcing the other side to start the shooting. Lincoln believed that justified the military actions that he subsequently ordered to put down the rebellion.
