Answer:
The other choices the characters might have made are:
1. Mathilde Loisel could have gotten a natural flower as suggested by her husband.
2. Mathilde Loisel could still have attended the ball without a necklace.
3. Her husband shouldn't have suggested borrowing from Madamme Forestier.
Explanation:
Mathilde Loisel and her husband were preparing to attend an event and she discovered she didn't have any ornament to accompany her dressing. Her husband suggested to her to get a natural flower and make do with it but she wasn't satisfied. Then he further suggested to her to borrow from her friend, Madamme Forestier which she finnally opted in.
"The Necklace" is a short story by a French author known as Guy De Maupassant. The story setting took place in France several hundred years ago. Mathilde Loisel and her husband lives in a flat; they are not luxurious couples, but simple and are not poor. Mathilde, however, always longs to be rich as a result, she tends to envy her friend Jeanne who was rich and had lots of jewelry.
Dicken's object of social criticism which is referred in this excerpt is that, the system of education which treats children as if they are machines. It is shown in the novel that only the society but it did not focus on its emotional context.
Teachers only cared about the results of the input which they gave and if is not corrected then the students will bring to the society.
This is the reason why there is a big gap which is between the poor and the rich. Rich believes that the poor can make it if they can strive harder.
He wanted to be closer to his sister, <span>This symbolized his desire for human interaction and emotional connection</span>
Answer:
creating laws and appointing heads of federal agencies
This question is incomplete because you are missing part of it; here is the complete question:
Indicate the appropriateness of the subject for a four- to six-page research paper by answering the following question.
Is the following topic suitable for a research paper? Why or why not? how a cheetah eats its food
A. No, it is too broad.
B. No, it is too narrow.
C. Yes, it is broad enough.
D. Yes, it is narrow enough.
The answer to this question is B. No, it is too narrow
Explanation:
In a research paper, especially in one of four to six pages, you are required to provide multiple ideas from different sources to explain the main topic. This implies the topic is appropriate only if it requires the author to give many details or can develop it in 4 to 6 pages. This does not occur if you write about "how a cheetah eats its food" because it is likely cheetahs have only one or few ways to eat their food, and therefore this topic does not require multiple details. According to this, the topic is not suitable because it requires few details or ideas, thus, the reason that makes it inappropriate is that is too narrow.
