Ssnsjdjdjdjdjsjssjjsjssjjdsjjs
The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Answer:hold onmm
Explanation: 23 is the answer I dont know how bu I guss that is
Whittier used "We" and "Thou" as forms of repetition in his song of slaves in the desert.
We: He used we as to show that basically slaves WERE NOT alone in this at all. In a way at that time, every single slave was connected with each other no matter what.
Thou: From what i have seen, Whittier is using "Thou" to refer to God. For example: "We are fools, but Thou art wise"
For the devices, he's using Anaphora for "Thou" and maybe Conduplicatio for "We".
