1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hoochie [10]
2 years ago
8

Why was the Supreme Court's ruling important in Gitlow v. New York with respect to due process?

History
2 answers:
djverab [1.8K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

try B.)

Explanation:

Rama09 [41]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Why was the case of Gitlow vs New York Important?

New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had extended the First Amendment's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S. states.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In the house of representatives, the number of votes a state gets depends on this
Bumek [7]

Answer:

Under the Constitution, each state has two senators. However, the number of representatives a state has depends on the population of the state. Every state must have at least one representative though. Law now sets the total number of representatives at 435.

According to Trumanlibrary.gov

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was NOT an economic factor of the move west?​
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

Business freedom for runaway slaves

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which Supreme Court decision did Brown v. Board of Education (1954) overturn?
Wewaii [24]
<span>Plessy v. Ferguson.....</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Although he tried not to be ________, Washignton often sided with Alexander Hamilton
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

bias?

Explanation:

washington tried to be nutral

5 0
3 years ago
According to Hamilton, what was a failure of the Articles of Confederation that would be corrected by the new
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

1. The government could not make laws under the Articles but would be able to under the Constitution.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation mandated the passage of constitutional law to entail the consent of at least nine of the thirteen states, and the adoption of an amendment mandated unanimous approval. This has made lawmaking difficult. this reflects the ineffectiveness of the government to make laws because more power was vested in state governments. Furthermore, each State has been granted the right to decide whether or not they wish to follow certain laws. On the other hand, federal government became more strong under the new constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What happens after the actions mentioned in the quote? The Senate votes on the bill. The bill goes to a committee. The bill goes
    6·2 answers
  • Help with this economics questions please
    13·2 answers
  • Is the secretary of the post office a part of the president's cabinet?
    13·1 answer
  • Use the following two words in a sentence about the first Washington presidency. a. precedent b.cabinet *
    8·2 answers
  • Starting in the mid-18oos, hoards of people traveled to the West out of a desire to
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between muslim and Christian art
    13·1 answer
  • The purpose of the Small Business Administration is to ______________________________________
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Church use art to help strengthen their argument about the nature of Jesus?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the colonists feel about splitting with the colonies?
    7·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!