Answer:
$1070.55
Explanation:
Expense ratio is the fee charged by fund managers for managing your investment.
so if you invest $58,500 assuming no return this year, the fee deductible would be simply 1.83% of $58,500
This amounts to $1070.55
Hope this helps.
Answer:
A. No, because Ahmed is not a merchant.
Explanation:
Implied warranty of merchantability is a law in contract which states that when there is a transaction between a seller (the merchant), and a buyer, there is an unwritten guarantee from the seller, that the product meets up to the ordinary standards of care. This means that the goods must be fit to do what the merchant says it will do. Therefore, if the seller finds it defective, he could return it to the seller. and if the seller refuses to make a change, a legal case could be established. The merchant by law is a wholesaler or retailer, who sells goods in which he has expertise or special skills.
Ahmed in the question could be argued in court to not be a merchant of cars and as such, has no expertise with which he can make a guarantee for the car being sold to Carlos.
An easy-to-read, monthly statement, that clearly lists medicare claims information is a Medicare summary notice.
<h3>What is a Medicare summary notice?</h3>
MSN is a statement received by the people with Original Medicare recipients every three months in the mail for services covered by Medicare Part A and Part B.
It is a system that notifies consumers about Medicare benefit decisions. You will not receive an MSN for that 3-month period if you do not receive any services or emergency aid during that time.
This notification might assist you in keeping track of your and in expenses and ensuring that you were correctly invoiced for the treatments you experienced.
It also helps to compare the information on your notification with the healthcare providers', statements, and receipts.
Learn more about the Medicare summary notice, here:
brainly.com/question/24225728
#SPJ1
Answer:
A bond portfolio and a stock portfolio both provided an unrealized pretax return of 8% to a taxable investor. If the stocks paid no dividends, we know that the ________.
The after-tax return of the stock portfolio was higher than the after-tax return of the bond portfolio.
Explanation:
The returns from the bond portfolio are taxed at the corporate rate while returns from stock investments are taxed at a lower rate. It is well-known that the risks from stock are higher than the risks from bonds. As a result, the stock investments always attract higher returns and less tax, as the investor can postpone the tax for a longer term. Again, stock investments can be for the long-term unlike bonds that have defined periods.
In a case whereby poornima gupta is retiring soon, so she is concerned about her investments providing her steady income every year, the risk is poornima most concerned about protecting against is interest reinvestment risk.
<h3>What is
interest reinvestment risk?</h3>
Reinvestment rate risk can be described as the risk that should be considered in the case whereby the investor have the reason to carry out reinvestment in regards with the future cash flows which could come inform of a lower return as a result of the interest rate declines.
It should be that this risk is very important to be taken serious by the investors because any slight mistake can result to very huge lost in the part of the investor and this can bring down there investor in term of finance which is very dangerous for his health as well as other investment that he have outside.
Read more about risk at:
brainly.com/question/17583177
#SPJ1
