I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option 4. A common goal of the Proclamation of Neutrality (1793), the Embargo Act (1807), and the Monroe Doctrine (1823) would be <span>encouraging independence movements in Latin America. Hope this answers the question.</span>
The most controversial agreement at Yalta was probably allowing Soviet Union to take control over Eastern Europe (answer: <span>C. the granting of Soviet authority over the nations of Eastern Europe)
This decision later led to the Cold war that lasted till 1991.
</span>
Based on the true facts and information about this said that: The conquest<span> of </span>Italy<span> began soon after the </span>Romans<span> expelled the Tarquins in 509 BC; their first target were the Etruscans themselves. Allying themselves with other Latins and with the Greeks, the </span>Romans<span> quickly drove the Etruscans from the </span>Italian <span>peninsula. Etruscan civilization came to a brutal end. </span>
An absolute monarch is a monarch who rules without a constitution in place. They have absolute power and make all decisions for the country. They are not elected by the people; instead they inherit the throne.
A constitutional monarch is a monarch who rules with a constitution in place. They usually share their power with representatives of another branch of government that's elected by the people. For example, in old Britain, constitutional monarchs would rule alongside Parliament. Other countries may have other names for Parliament, but it's the same idea.
