Jim Crow laws and the heavy segregation down in South
The subject-verb agreement rule which is being broken in the sentence above is c<span>ollective subjects functioning as a unit require singular verbs.
The collective subject <em>the crew </em>requires a singular verb, because it denotes a single unit. So, instead of using the verb <em>have visited, </em>it should have been <em>has visited. </em></span>
<em>the other term for this is <u /><u>sparsely populated..
</u>mean the area under observation does not have enough crowd or people... they may be audience in a cinema or public or citizens in a city...<u>
</u></em>
I think it is morpheme i think but dont remeber
The statement that best explains how knowing the definition of <em>trifles</em> is useful in understanding the given passage is the statement B. <em>It shows that older people often ignore or minimize children's feelings.</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In the given context, the noun <em>trifle </em>means <em>a thing of little or no importance.</em><em> </em>As a verb, <em>trifle </em>has a fairly similar meaning: <em>to treat without respect or seriousness. </em>If we understand the meaning of this word, we can understand the given excerpt with no problem: people tend to think that the sorrows of children are unimportant compared to those of grown-up people. If someone thinks that, it doesn't mean that it's true. That is why statement A is incorrect. Statement C is not relevant to the given passage, while statement D states the opposite of what the passage says.
Learn more about the ways to make your messages clear here: brainly.com/question/7015763
#LearnWithBrainly
