Answer:
Yes and no.
Explanation:
Yes because he could have been forced into this.
No because there could be parental consent.
Answer:
a. How will the $20,000 payments be treated by Fred and Tammy if covered by prior law? b. How will the payments be treated if the divorce is covered by new law? c. What is Tammy's basis in the residence? d. What role would a tax adviser play in a divorce?
Explanation:
a. For Fred, the 20,000 must be included in income. There is no deduction for paying alimony. For Tammy, the amount is not included in income.
b. If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Fred can deduct the $20,000 payments as alimony.
If the divorce was complete prior to December 31, 2018, Tammy must include the $20,000 payments in gross income.
c. It's $100.000,00
d. Tax advisors are responsible for determining the value of property given in lieu of cash for an alimony payment.
It comes from the Latin word "forensis" pertaining to a forum. ... The meaning of "forensic" later came to be restricted to refer to the courts of law. The word entered English usage in 1659.
A) Each party sees the national convention as a way to unify and strengthen its party
Hope this helped, good luck!
Answer:
When being a witness against themselves it means They don’t have to give any results regarding them I think that’s what it means I’m not sure look it up
