This is the complete question
O A.
The new definition for planets needs to be considered as settled moving forward.
OB.
The IAU used poor methods when setting a new definition for planets.
OC.
It is uncertain whether the definition of planet will remain the same in the future.
OD
Pluto should not have been the reason why IAU changed the definition of planets.
It is uncertain whether the definition of the planet will remain the same in the future. Thus, option "C" is correct.
<h3>What is the description of planets?</h3>
The description of planets has been updated by the International Astronomical Union. In the current description, the planet is regarded if it satisfies three criteria.
It will be in the sun's direction, it should have enough mass to have stable hydro stability, and the area should be clear. It is unclear if the definition will stay the same in the world because certain planets will convey such distinctive features and the concept may be modified.
Thus, option "C" is correct.
To learn more about planets click here:
brainly.com/question/14581221
#SPJ1
Answer:
b) the justice system that is objective and unflawed
Explanation:
I think
Answer:
I do not need my freedom
Explanation:
I do not need my freedom when I'm dead. I cannot live on tomorrow's bread. ... The extended metaphor of tomorrow's bread also fits well as a comparison with freedom. We need bread to eat and we need freedom to live as a full person.
Persuasion becomes more agreeable and beneficial when one attacks with consciousness. The attack is done well if the values of the person being persuaded is brought upon the subject of the conversation. During the Biblical times, talking to Kings and asking favor from them meant that the persuasion should incorporate his values in order to make it more effective.
