Answer:
Risk of bias assessment (sometimes called "quality assessment" or "critical appraisal") helps to establish transparency of evidence synthesis results and findings. A risk of bias assessment is often performed for each included study in your review. Evidence syntheses strive to eliminate bias in their findings.
Explanation:
<h2>
<u>PLEASE</u><u> </u><u>MARK</u><u> ME</u><u> BRAINLIEST</u><u> AND</u><u> FOLLOW</u><u> M</u><u> E</u><u> LOTS</u><u> OF</u><u> LOVE</u><u> FROM</u><u> MY</u><u> HEART</u><u> AND</u><u> SOUL</u><u> DARLING</u><u> </u><u>TEJASWI</u><u> HERE</u><u> ❤️</u></h2>
There are different kinds of system of government. The “spoils” of the spoils system, was established in the late 1820s, were government jobs taken from a current president’s opponents and given to supporters.
<h3>What was the spoils system?
</h3>
The spoils system is also known as the patronage system. It is the practice in where political party winning an election gives incentives or rewards to its campaign workers.
They also reward their other kinds of supporters by the act of giving them various appointment in government posts or other kinds of favours.
Learn more about the spoils system from
brainly.com/question/722628
Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:
Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.
Answer:
The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Explanation:
The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:
- The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
- The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
sherman act of 1890<span>
The Sherman Act outlaws "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade," and any "monopolization, attempted monopolization.</span>
<span>The antitrust act prohibits price fixing and other conspiracies and combinations that restrain trade and attempts to monopolize.</span>
he wanted to side with Britain instead of France. not sure what my options are that would help
