1. Sufficiency of the Writing Westbank Real Estate, Inc. owns 10 acres of forested land. Westbank wants the land cleared in orde
r to build houses. Westbank emails a signed electronic memorandum to a representative of Hardell Lumber Co. offering to sell the mature trees and rich topsoil to Hardell for lumber and agricultural purposes. The electronic memorandum includes the parties' typed names, the consideration, the price, and a description of the property, lumber, and soil. Hardell replies via email to Westbank that it accepts Westbank's terms, electronically signs the memorandum, and will start removing the trees and soil next month. Before Hardell can begin clearing the land, Westbank changes its mind, wants to keep the land forested, and prevents Hardell from accessing the property claiming no contract has been formed. The Statute of Frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing. All of these contracts must be in writing except
A promise to work for an employer honestly for the rest of life
Explanation:
When the representative of Hardell Co received a separate email from WestBank Real estate, that person should have informed his security or sustainability department and had whistled the blow. Instead he kept the mail privately and infact replied to WestBank. This is totally a case of conflict of interest and falls in stature of fraud that the employer hasn’t remained loyal to the company for which he is currently working with
<span>The reliance on only observable entities in order to come up with laws is realism. In arts for example, realism aims to present its subject and the art itself without being superficial but only the truth and nothing but the truth. Therefore it avoids any fantasy-related elements. </span>
A feeble Executive<span> implies a </span>feeble<span> execution of the government. A </span>feeble <span>execution is but another phrase for a bad execution; and a government ill executed.</span>
I believe the answer is: <span> Government bailouts for failing corporations.
Adam Smith was a prominent supporter of letting the Free market decides who would survive and who wouldn't. He believed that government intervention (such as bailing out failing corporations) would disrupt the balance in the market and would risk market crash.</span>