Answer:
10*85/100 = 8.5
10 percent of 85 is 8.5 so 20 percent is 17
Step-by-step explanation:
Complete question is;
Alejandro and Noya were told to draw a net for an octagonal prism. Which statement about the students’ nets is true? Both nets do not form octagonal prisms.
A) Only Alejandro’s net is correct.
B) Only Noya’s net is correct.
C) Neither net is correct.
D) Both nets are correct.
Answer:
C) Neither net is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the second attached image, we can see what an octagonal prism looks like when it is opened to show all the faces.
However, looking at the first attached image showing the net drawings of boya and Alejandro, it is very clear that none of them got the required shape for the octagonal prism. Therefore, we can conclude that neither of the nets are correct.
Answer with Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that
RS and TV bisect each other at point X.
![VX=XT](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=VX%3DXT)
![SX=XR](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SX%3DXR)
We have to prove that TR is parallel to SV.
In triangle TXR and VXS
Reason: Given
![SX=XR](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SX%3DXR)
Reason: Given
![\angle TXR=\angle VXS](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cangle%20TXR%3D%5Cangle%20VXS)
Reason: Vertical opposite angles
![\triangle TXR\cong \triangle VXS](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctriangle%20TXR%5Ccong%20%5Ctriangle%20VXS)
Reason:SAS Postulate
![\angle TRX=\angle VSX](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cangle%20TRX%3D%5Cangle%20VSX)
Reason: CPCT
![TR\parallel SV](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=TR%5Cparallel%20SV)
Reason: Converse of alternate interior angles theorem
Hence, proved.
Hey there :)
When you subtract the third number from second, you get first
2 - ( -3 ) = 5
Sum of third number and four times the second number is equal to first number
- 3 + 4 ( 2 ) = 5
Sum of all three numbers is 4
5 - 3 + 2 = 4
First number = 5
Second number = 2
Third number = - 3