Answer: It can be proven using objective evidence.
Explanation:
Factual information can be proven by objective evidence based on research into the information. Information that is not factual can also be proven to be baseless by the same method.
If indeed therefore, that the above scenario can be proven by objective evidence then it would be considered factual. Should there be an investigation and the evidence is not objective, this would not have been factual.
A- It's from educated experts and does not contain the same bias as D
Answer:
The sentence that uses omission correctly is:
C. One serious omission in the team list was the name of the coach.
Explanation:
<u>Omission is a noun</u>, which allows us to eliminate option B since the sentence is using it as a verb. <u>Omission means failing to include something or someone. When you omit, you leave out, you exclude</u>. Having that meaning in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and D, since the context in those two sentences does not allow for the use of omission.
<u>Letter C is the best option. It uses omission as the noun it is, and the context and the meaning are a match. According to the sentence, leaving the name of the coach out of the team list was a serious mistake.</u>
