The correct answer is: [B]: "parallelism" .
________________________________________________
Yes, unlike a summary you are describing the *whole* book, movie, etc. You include what would be considered spoilers, and how it ends.
Answer:
1.The process of amending a state constitution is the following:
Before describing it, it is important for you to know that each state of the U.S. has its own rules and procedures that administer the way its constitution should be amended.
These are some of the ways a state constitution can be amend:
It can be changed through judicial action. It happens when a federal court proclaim that some part of the constitution is unconstitutional under the U.S constitution.
Another way is going through a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment.
This method is only approved by 18 states and it is: by the way of an initiated constitutional amendment.
Only in Florida is allowed to amend the constitution through a commission-referred amendment process.
Only in Delaware can be possible to do it through direct action of the state legislature, and
Last it can be done by a constitutional convention.
2. Initiative process: This process that allows all the citizens of a state pass over their local legislature and propose a constitutional or statute amendment. There are two types of initiative, direct and indirect.
3. Referendum process: Permits citizens to vote on a law that had passed by the legislature to stop it from taking effect. There are two types of referendums, the legislative and the popular.
Explanation:
In their research article, <em>Intergroup Dynamics of extra-legal police aggression: an integrated theory of race and place</em> by Malcolm D. Holmes and Brad W. Smith, the authors debate the issue of use of excesive force by police authorities to control and maintain order in communities where there is presence of racial minorities that are perceived sometimes as a threat to the larger community. They define extra-legal police aggression as the use of extra means, sometimes unnecessary and illegal, to enforce control and good behavior within communities. These extra means can be the use of actual physical force, coercion, threats, verbal abuse, and others. Also, it seems that this attitude on the part of police forces comes in direct response to the presence of racial and ethnic minorities in communities, that for some reason are perceived as factors for greater criminal activities and unsafety. The authors mention in their article that sometimes, due to the characteristics of a community, especially those with the presence of minorities, where in fact there is a higher criminal rate, police officers seem to feel almost forced to use extra means of control, because their regular tactics do not produce the desired effects and they are the ones who suffer the consequences, both public and personally. It seems that the use of certain extralegal tactics, such as verbal threats and certain attitudes from police officers, instead of the use of outright force, are preferable because while they give results, they are not producing direct violations to human and civil rights and also because the use of physical force only produces the use of more violent acts, instead of helping control violence and crime.
