Answer:
I believe is because they were not unsatisfied with Great Britain and it's acts on the Colony.
Explanation:
When we analyze the American Revolution and look at each side, it's common to interpret their relationship based on the concept of good against evil, or good actions and bad actions. However, we forget that the war was fought by common people, with their motivations. And that's the case of Loyalists. <em><u>They were not unsatisfied with Great Britain</u></em>, maybe <em><u>because they were wealthy enough; or because they believed that Great Britain's actions were normal. </u></em>Or because they didn't believed that the <u><em>fight against England was not only unnecessary but wrong.</em></u>
Answer:
He was against anti-lynching legislation.
Explanation:
Concurrent powers are powers that are shared by both the State and the federal government. These powers may be exercised simultaneously within the same territory and in relation to the same body of citizens. These concurrent powers including regulating elections, taxing, borrowing money and establishing courts.
Hope it helps :P :)
Answer: Ineffective Generaling
Explanation:
According to John Green in the series, <em>Crash Course US History,</em> the North lost several battles during the beginning years of the Civil war due to ineffective leadership from the Union Generals. A term he called <em>Ineffective Generaling</em>.
This was in reference to the ineffectiveness of leaders such as Maj. Generals Benjamin Butler, John Pope, Ambrose Burnside and even the overly indecisive and cautious George McClellan all of whom allowed the Confederacy to gain an advantage in battles against the Union which was larger and better equipped.
