Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Spoils system is a form of socio-political governmental practice in which the ruling party compensated its dedicated supporters and those that campaigned heavily for them with a political appointment or government jobs or positions.
Spoils system is considered a problem because it often leads to the employment of people in the government based on party nepotism rather than competency.
It leads to abuse of political power by the ruling party
It increases the acts of bribery and undue influence
Answer:
Virginia
Explanation:
Virginia would be the answer because that's when
The answer to the question stated above is <span>fewer regulations and lower taxes
Fewer regulations and lower taxes helped manufacturers keep up with consumers in the 1920s.
The government helped in this by keeping taxes as low as possible. They also followed the policy of laissez faire, whereby the government interfered as little as possible in the running of the economy. hope i helped
</span>
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above would be option B. <span>MLA styles is typically used by authors and students creating writing projects especially in the field of humanities. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Mapp Vs Ohio issues refer to a judicial case that took place in 1961, in which the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in a case where evidence presented at a trial was illegally obtained and used against the defendant.
Miss Mapp was a woman who refused to admit the intrussion of three Cleveland police officers into her house in persuit to some evidence in connection with a recent bombing issue. Officers did’nt have any warrant signed by a judge when they arrived to her home.
During the case, attorney allegated the protection of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the US (current since 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights) for the woman. This amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property and implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional