The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts
Answer:
If children ruled, it would be a madhouse! They would make rules that were like: "No school," or "Boys only!" They would also have control over the food they eat. Sugar all day! And you know what happens when kids eat too much sugar....! Basically, the world would crumble in days.
Have a great day!
Let's write complete sentences using the given words:
1. Van Gogh's paintings are almost as expensive as the work of Picasso.
2. We did not know the Recycled Orchestra until we watched the video online yesterday.
For the first sentence, we can see that the purpose is to compare the work of two painters, Van Gogh and Picasso. That is why we use the structure "as ... as". We must place the adjective "expensive" in the middle: "almost as expensive as".
For the second sentence, we do not need to add anything. However, because of the word "yesterday", we know the sentence refers to something that happened in the past. Thus, we use the Simple Past tense for the verbs: not know - did not know; watch - watched.
In conclusion, all we need to do is read the words to grasp what the purpose of each sentence is and then add or change whatever is necessary to form a complete sentence.
Learn more about the Simple Past tense here:
brainly.com/question/14025107?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
increasingly committed to making decisions based on evidence and well-reasoned argument. Critical thinking can be broken down into three levels: experience, interpretation, and evaluation.
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS
