Answer and Explanation:
Kristof postulates a primitive caricature of a gun-rights argument. He delivered an inadequate response thoroughly, which was designed to settle the issue, and then he repeated the cycle. In other words, he constructed one straw man after another and failed to do the best any of them. Kristof first claimed to answer the “argument” that cars are more likely to kill a person than guns, but we don’t try to ban cars. Here’s the core of Kristof’s responded that
They could not ban cars, but they can work hard to take out a dangerous product and regulate that product to limit the damage.
They had tried to avoid the damage through seatbelts and airbags, speed limits and highway barriers, driver’s licenses and insurance requirements, crackdowns on drunken driving and texting while driving. He calculated that since 1921, the auto fatality rate had reduced per 100 million miles driven by 95 percent.
I would have to say that A makes the most sense. You are correct in your thinking. If you put b, c, d, and e at the end of asleep then these options don't really make sense. Hopefully this helps.
Answer:
McCarthy launched the House of Un-American Committee (HUAC) which investigated Nazi ties within the U.S. but later after WW2 changed to investigate citizens with communist ties. He was also responsible for the Red Scare: the potential rise of Communism within the United States.Explanation:
McCarthy launched the House of Un-American Committee (HUAC) which investigated Nazi ties within the U.S. but later after WW2 changed to investigate citizens with communist ties. He was also responsible for the Red Scare: the potential rise of Communism within the United States.
<span>needing much effort or skill to accomplish, deal with, or understand:</span>
Answer:
When he beats his bars and he would be free;
It is not a carol of joy or glee,
This is the first time that the speaker tells us explicitly why the caged bird is singing: it wants to be "free." This sets up freedom as an important idea in the poem. This is a poem about a bird wanting, but not being able, to get free.
These lines continue the alliteration of the B words, in "beats" and "bars." B is a strong sound, and the repetition of this sound evokes the idea of the bird beating violently against the bars of its cage.
So, when we hear that really pretty song the bird sings in its cage, we shouldn't assume that it's singing because it's happy. As the speaker tells us, "It is not a carol of joy or glee."
Does this help?
