The answer is B.2...that sentence does not make any sense
<span>He is indifferent.
Because D doesn't really dislike dirt, he doesn't feel that it's important to wash it off. This is showing how he is indifferent to the customs of his culture. Most people would wash themselves, but he doesn't really see why that's so important so he doesn't. </span>
The concept of retouching photos is a touchy subject.
Photographers must ask themselves: When does retouching a photo cross over into going too far? Is editing a photo to convince viewers of something false an acceptable practice? Does retouching a photo set unrealistic and false expectations for consumers?
We’ve outlined both sides of the argument – and want you to decide for yourself. What side are you on?
It’s a Lie: The Argument Against Retouching
Programs like Adobe Photoshop allow users to make changes to pictures so they look slightly or completely different from their original appearance. These programs can enhance certain features, diminish or completely erase certain features and even add features.
When magazines, businesses and advertisements retouch photos, a common argument is that this delivers a false message to the consumer. The photo is not truthful and therefore it is lying to the consumer.
The correct definition should be
not personal because the prefix "im" means not
