1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galina1969 [7]
3 years ago
12

What were the Lincoln-Douglas debates and why were they important

History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<em>Lincoln-Douglas debates propelled Lincoln's political career into the national spotlight, while simultaneously stifling Douglas' career, and foreshadowing the 1860 Election. By 1858, Stephen A. Douglas was the most prominent politician in the West, if not the entire country. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates between Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas and Republican challenger Abraham Lincoln during the 1858 Illinois senatorial campaign. The main issue of the debates was the extension of slavery into American territories.</em>

Explanation(Short it up): <em><u>The Lincoln Douglas debates were a series of debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas and they were both running for senate. The debate was mainly about slavery.</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

You might be interested in
What are two possible outcomes of inequity?
yulyashka [42]

Inequality of outcomes occurs when individuals do not possess the same level of material wealth or overall living economic conditions. Development theory has largely been concerned with inequalities in standards of living, such as inequalities in income/wealth, education, health, and nutrition

Explanation:The major examples of social inequality include income gap, gender inequality, health care, and social class. In health care, some individuals receive better and more professional care compared to others.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think about objectivity have you ever tried to be objective when setting a dispute between two people or when making a decision
Len [333]

Answer:yes

Explanation:

bw

8 0
3 years ago
HELP !! Match these Items.
Korvikt [17]

Answer:

1. March of destruction ⇒ <u>Sherman</u>

2. Capital of Confederacy  ⇒ <u>Richmond</u>

3. President of the Confederacy  ⇒ <u>Jefferson Davis</u>

4. North's ironclad  ⇒ <u>Monitor</u>

5. Captured New Orleans  ⇒ <u>Admiral Farragut</u>

6. South gains confidence ⇒ <u>Battle of Bull Run</u>

7. Struggle between proslavery and antislavery groups ⇒<u> ''Bleeding Kansas''.</u>

8. Lee surrenders ⇒ <u>Appomattox Court House.</u>

9. Last Confederate offensive ⇒ <u>Battle of Gettysburg</u>

10. South's ironclad ⇒<u> Virginia </u>

11. Cut communication with South ⇒<u> Battle of Petersburg</u>

12. Gained control of all the Mississippi River ⇒ <u>Battle of Vicksburg</u>

13. Led Northern forces in the West ⇒ <u>General Grant</u>

14. Attempt to capture Maryland ⇒<u> Battle of Antietam</u>  

15. "Stonewall" Jackson killed ⇒ <u>Battle of Chancellorsville </u>

16. Commander of the Army of Northern Virginia ⇒ <u>General Lee</u>

4 0
3 years ago
Southerners claimed that abolitionist victories were creating a "wedge" in
wariber [46]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Southerners claimed that abolitionist victories were creating a "wedge" in the Union. What they meant by this was that people from the South -who heavily supported slavey in their territories- thought that as abolitionists' ideas spread to the northern states, these somehow weakened the Union in that these ideas confronted their people through so much debate. For the southerners, this represented an advantage and creation distraction while the South gained time and maintained slavery in the large plantations, producing the kinds of crops that moved their economy.

Were they correct? Not at all but they had a point in that so much debate on the issue of slavery and the increasing idea of abolitionism distracted decision-makers in the northern states. Those were the years were more supporters of abolition made their moves. For instance, in Rochester, New York, Frederick Douglass led the newspaper "The North Star," an abolitionist publication that somehow exerted pressure in the public opinion.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the French and Indian war start? ​
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The French and Indian War, which took place between 1754-1763, began due to a conflict between England and France over control of the Ohio River Valley. Both sides wanted the valley so they could expand their settlements into the area.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was Rosa Parks approach on Racism and Segregation?
    12·2 answers
  • Sports became popular in the late 1800s because
    14·1 answer
  • Mr. Alvarez works in the city of San Francisco. He drives to his home in a community just outside the city. He lives in
    10·1 answer
  • The Petition of Right demanded that Parliament determine the king’s successor.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between constitutional monarchies and traditional monarchies
    6·1 answer
  • What was most likley the key to aryan success?​
    15·2 answers
  • What were the names of the two plans created to set up the new government?
    7·1 answer
  • How was the british involved in the american civil war
    9·2 answers
  • I neeed help asap pleaseeee
    10·1 answer
  • Answer this for brainliest
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!