1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
galina1969 [7]
3 years ago
12

What were the Lincoln-Douglas debates and why were they important

History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

<em>Lincoln-Douglas debates propelled Lincoln's political career into the national spotlight, while simultaneously stifling Douglas' career, and foreshadowing the 1860 Election. By 1858, Stephen A. Douglas was the most prominent politician in the West, if not the entire country. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates between Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas and Republican challenger Abraham Lincoln during the 1858 Illinois senatorial campaign. The main issue of the debates was the extension of slavery into American territories.</em>

Explanation(Short it up): <em><u>The Lincoln Douglas debates were a series of debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas and they were both running for senate. The debate was mainly about slavery.</u></em>

<em><u /></em>

You might be interested in
Example of data that a historian would use is
RideAnS [48]
Im going with pictorial data
4 0
3 years ago
How did the patriots convince people to support
aliina [53]

Answer:b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
What happened during the Venezuelan crisis?
madam [21]

Answer: During the Venezuelan crisis (2010-present) many things happened:

  • National and per capita GDPs between 2013-2017 were lower than those of the US during the Great Depresion.
  • +240 deaths, +18400 injuries and +34000 detained.
  • Venezuela has developed an estimated debt of 105 billion US$.
  • There have been constant shortages of all types of products, even basic necessities like toilet paper or medicine.
  • Venezuela´s unemployment rate increased drastically and the country´s economy became one of the poorest in the world.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Read the information on Rex v. Zenger (1735). Be sure to select "Read More" to learn more. What year did this ruling occur, a
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

It occurred august 4th, 1735 in the colony of New York. This case is about the government who tried to silence a man because they didn’t like what he was saying. At the time the government was the king and there was no First Amendment. The jury found him not guilty because they saw this for what it was. This is a good example of the colonists believing the government should have limited power, and led directly to the First Amendment 40 years later

hope this helps!✌️

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which river is being described by these statements? A) the Nile River B) the Congo River C) the Tigris River D) the Euphrates Ri
    10·1 answer
  • In one paragraph (5-7 Sentences) explain the five freedoms of the 1st
    10·1 answer
  • Why did native americans support the british rather than the americans?
    13·2 answers
  • Create a public good for school ? Keep in mind isn't not free and will be paid by tax payers.
    14·1 answer
  • Many prominent Americans opposed the Vietnam War, while some supported it.
    5·2 answers
  • What’s the difference in tax collection per person in 1880 and 2016 ?
    5·1 answer
  • An example of a social reform directly related to the ___ is_____ <br> Because_ ______
    8·1 answer
  • What is the topic of "When I Make Myself Imagine"?
    8·1 answer
  • In the Trans-African slave trade, other things were traded besides human cargo. The Arab nations along the Mediterranean Sea and
    12·1 answer
  • I already asked this question but no one answered. Please help!!
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!