Answer:
restating (i think), or summarizing
Explanation:
Answer:
see below for email
Explanation:
Dear (friend's name),
Thank you for the birthday gift. It was much appreciated! I have been wanting something just like this for a while.
How have you been? It feel like forever since we've last talked. Maybe we could plan to meet sometime in the near future.
Thank you again for the thoughtful gift.
Sincerely,
(your name)
B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
My answer is danger b/c the wind is trying to pull itself off the ledge to save itself even while being depressed
