The cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
<h3>What happened at the 1954 Hague cultural property convention?</h3>
The Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Aggressive War is the first international convention that focuses only on cultural property protection in armed conflict. It was signed on 14 May 1954 in The Hague, Netherlands, and went into effect on 7 August 1956.
<h3>Why did the Hague Convention come into being?</h3>
These accords are known as "The Hague Conventions" because they were adopted at the 1899 and 1907 Peace Conferences in The Hague, Netherlands.
They formalize the laws and traditions of war by specifying the regulations that belligerents must observe throughout hostilities.
Hence, it is right to state that the cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
Learn more about Hague Cultural Convention:
brainly.com/question/10805709
#SPJ1
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. <span>The </span>Triple Alliance<span> was a secret agreement between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed on 20 May 1881.</span>
Answer:
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824) was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.
Explanation:In 1819 Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons, who was operating steamboats in the same waters without the authority of Fulton and Livingston. Ogden won in 1820 in the New York Court of Chancery. Gibbons appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, contending that he was protected by terms of a federal license to engage in coasting trade.
Because he was a communist dictator
