There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)
Explanation:
In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.
The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.
Answer:
It should be left to state control because, its at a state level. a state level such as your local police , fire fighters , mayors etc. if it was brought to national control it would be chaos as national control is every state in the US.
sorry im kinda busy so i cant answer as good as i want to but it should be left to state control.
Explanation:
I don't know why don't you answer it yourself
Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
