Answer:
They did not state exactly what the width or length is. So in this case, let's name the number of width to be x. And thus we can derive to the conclusion of,
Step-by-step explanation:
Width : x
Length : x-44 (from the 1st sentence of question)
So, We all know that a rectangle has 2 Lengths and 2 widths. So we can derive the conclusion that,
2(x)+2(x-44)=150150
2x+2x-88=150150
4x-88= 150150
4x= 150150+88=150238
4x=150238
x= 150238÷4
=37559.5
Answer: Range is something
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Sample Response
Step-by-step explanation:
He is incorrect because if you substitute x for 37 you will get the equation 8×37+200. 8×37=296 +200= 496. Since it is not greater or equal to 500 the inequality is not true.
Answer:
<h2>
50+50i</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression (2 + i)(3 - i)(1 + 2i)(1 - i)(3 + i), we are to take the product of all the complex values. We must note that i² = -1.
Rearranging the expression [(3 - i)(3 + i)] [(2 + i)(1 - i)](1 + 2i)
On expansion
(3 - i)(3 + i)
= 9+3i-3i-i²
= 9-(-1)
= 9+1
(3 - i)(3 + i) = 10
For the expression (2 + i)(1 - i), we have;
(2 + i)(1 - i)
= 2-2i+i-i²
= 2-i+1
= 3-i
Multiplying 3-i with the last expression (1 + 2i)
(2 + i)(1 - i)(1 + 2i)
= (3-i)(1+2i)
= 3+6i-i-2i²
= 3+5i-2(-1)
= 3+5i+2
= 5+5i
Finally, [(3 - i)(3 + i)] [(2 + i)(1 - i)(1 + 2i)]
= 10(5+5i)
= 50+50i
Hence, (3 - i)(3 + i)(2 + i)(1 - i)(1 + 2i) is equivalent to 50+50i
Heyy ummm im tired I’ll answer this later
