sorry cant help.............................................
Hello
We can approach science from various angles. It may be that our aim is to solve a problem or to try to understand something. But, at the same time, what we find in it as explanatory or credible may be different if our profession is to be a trader, an importer of industrial equipment, a researcher or a teacher. Our concerns about science may differ according to the angle from which we think about it. That is to say, what is important when judging or evaluating science is different according to our relationship with it at certain times: whether we see it as producers, disseminators or consumers. Therefore, from the outset we have an area of complexity in thinking about science from our starting point.
Answer:
no ur good
Explanation:
he didnt seem upset and it was pretty funny
There are different variations in population size. The best reason why the simulation of the sampling distribution is not approximately normal is that The sample size was not sufficiently large.
<h3>What takes place if a sample size is not big enough?
</h3>
- When a sample size taken by a person or a researcher is not big or inadequate for the alpha level and also analyses that one have chosen to do, it will limit the study statistical power.
Due to the above, the ability to know a statistical effect in one's sample if the effect are present in the population is greatly reduces.
See full options below
Which of the following would be the best reason why the simulation of the sampling distribution is not approximately normal?
A The samples were not selected at random.
B The sample size was not sufficiently large.
с The population distribution was approximately normal.
D The samples were selected without replacement.
E The sample means were less than the population mean.
Previous question
Learn more about population size from
brainly.com/question/1279360
No product results in -1, hence δlmn is NOT a right triangle showing that lydia's assertion is incorrect
<h3>Perpendicular lines</h3>
In order to determine whether triangle lmn is right-angled, we need to determine the slope of lm, ln, and mn first as shown:
For the slope of lm:

For the slope of ln:

For the slope of mn:

- If any of the two lines is perpendicular, hence the triangle lmn is right-angled.
- To check, we will take the product of the slopes and see if it is equivalent to -1.
Product of slope lm and ln

Since no product results in -1, hence δlmn is NOT a right triangle showing that Lydia's assertion is incorrect
Learn more on slopes here: brainly.com/question/3493733