The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
At night on Christmas in 1776, the Patriots scored a victory at Trenton. The Battle of Trenton is the first major victory for the Continental Army. With General Washington leading the attack against Trenton and the Hessian troops sober from their Christmas celebrations, they were easily defeated while the Americans had only lost 2 soldiers.
This is correct.
Machiavelli was an Italian political philosopher whose famous work, the Prince, is an in-depth look at what is necessary for a ruler to be effective, both in terms of ruling a people but also in doing what needs to be done.
It promotes a good image and will easily and peacefully resolve contact
