1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
2 years ago
5

Who were the 4 Presidential candidates during the Election of 1860, what parties did they represent, and were they pro or anti-s

lavery? answer all 3 for each of the 4 candidates *
History
1 answer:
jek_recluse [69]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<em>Abraham Lincoln, John Breckenridge, John Bell, And Stephen Douglas</em>

Explanation:

<em>Abraham Lincoln → National Union Party → Lincoln was morally opposed to slavery </em>

<em>John Breckenridge → Democratic Party → Had publicly declared his opposition to "impairing in any form" the legal protection of slavery.</em>

<em>John Bell →  Democratic Party →  Bell opposed efforts to expand slavery to the U.S. territories.</em>

<em>Stephen Douglas → Democratic Party → Douglas believed that popular sovereignty would defuse the tension between the proslavery and antislavery factions.</em>

<em />

<em />

<em>I hope this helps!</em>

<em />

<em />

You might be interested in
How did the life and work of mohandas gandhi affect the u.s. civil rights movement?
kirill115 [55]

"Mohandas Gandhi, known also as Mahatma (“The great

soul”), was the leader of Indian independence movement in 1930s and 1940s. His

protest facing British colonist was non-violent, fought with only rousing speeches. Gandhi’s methods of non-violent protest inspired leaders of civil

rights movement, especially Martin Luther King."

4 0
3 years ago
A good historian needs a lot of patience.<br><br> True<br> False
jenyasd209 [6]
I would go with True because any historian needs a lot of patience to get what they want or to learn about something etc..
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the location of Greek homeland including Macedonia before 334 BCE<br><br> Please help.
aalyn [17]

1. The Greek homeland was in the southernmost part of the Balkan Peninsula, as well as the islands in the Aegean Sea. The northernmost point where the Greeks had territory was to the Mount Olympus. The location of the Greek homeland relative to the surrounding area comes to be in the central western part of Mediterranean Sea. It is still not totally clear from where did the Greeks came in this area, but it is thought that it was probably from Asia Minor, with their ancestors being known as Doric people.

*note: Macedonia was not part of the Greek city-states. The Macedonians had different ethnic background, different culture, and different language than the Greeks.

2. There's a common misconception that Alexander gained control of Greece, but that is actually not true. It was Alexander's father, Philip II of Macedon who conquered the Greek city-states, while Alexander inherited them and just strengthened the control over them as the Greeks openly hated the Macedonians who they considered as barbarians, so it was the biggest humiliation to be ruled by them. Also, it was no all Greek city-states that were conquered, with Sparta being left alone and independent.

3. Soon after he succeeded  the empire, Alexander started to organize military campaigns. He started with the Balkans, and managed to strengthen his positions in Thrace, southern Illiria, as well as Greece. Than he moved toward east, having numerous battles with the Persians, and constantly pushing them toward east. By the year of 332 BCE, the Macedonian Empire managed to include the southern half of the Balkans, Asia Minor, the western part of the Middle East, and Egypt.

4. The Macedonian army and the Persian army had lot of battles until the final outcome was decided. The Macedonian army, despite being significantly smaller, managed to win battle by battle, causing lot of damage to the Persians. Darius got very mad about how things were going, so he gathered enormous army, helped even by thousands of Greek soldiers who fought alongside the Persians despite having wars with them recently, but they hated the Macedonians more. Alexander showed his tactical abilities on the battlefield, by managing to outmaneuver the Persian army and destroy it at Gaugamela, with Darius having to flee from the scene so that he doesn't end up dead. With the emperor of Persia out of the way, this battle turned out to be decisive, and Alexander victoriously marched through Persia, claiming it as part of Macedonia.

5. After the win of Gaugamela, Alexander had the Persian Empire under his feet. He marched through it with his army, claiming the Persian lands to himself. The first stop that Alexander made was in the capital of Persia, Babylon, where he officially presented himself to the Persians as their new king. He then continued east to Susa, the former capital of Persepolis, before turning northwards to Pasargadae. The final major Persian city which was visited by Alexander was the capital of Bactria, Bactra, after which he started to move toward southeast and reached the Indian subcontinent.

6. Alexander's empire managed to stretch from the western Balkan as far east as the northwestern part of India, making it the largest empire the world had seen until then, and in fact it is still one of the largest empire to have ever existed. When compared the maximum size that the empire reached with the maps prior to the final conquests, it is easily noticeable that the Macedonian Empire has increased significantly, and on top of it, in a very short period of time. The empire managed to become so large in such a short period of time because the majority of the territory conquered by Alexander was actually controlled by Persia, so once Persia was defeated, the empire gained enormous territory over night.

3 0
2 years ago
who believed that the best economic system was one in which businesses compete to gain profit with minimal or no government cont
kicyunya [14]
I believe Economist such as Adam smith would believe that.
Adam smith is one of the original economists that popularized the free market system. He believed that even with less or no Government intervention, the Market will regulate itself to the power of 'invisible hands' (or what we known as the power of supply and demand that always move toward equilibrium)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The chariot gave this group military superiority over the Egyptians for a fifty-year period. Their design was light, had two whe
babymother [125]
The chariot gave the Hittites military superiority over the Egyptians for a fifty-year period. Their design was light, had two wheels, two horses, and two<span>riders</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prior to world war 1, tensions in the balkans were most related to which main cause of the war
    8·1 answer
  • Columbus asked Portugal's king to fund his voyage. The answer was no. Next, he asked the rulers of?​
    11·1 answer
  • ____ Japan’s economy was mostly in international commerce? true or false
    11·1 answer
  • What is the concept of sarung banggi​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups did NOT migrate to the Americas for religious freedom?
    5·1 answer
  • 3. Explain at least 3 of the key parts of Wilson's Fourteen Points Peace Plan.
    8·1 answer
  • 14. Which of the following statements is a fact?
    13·1 answer
  • Who were the historical people and what were their roles space race?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Parliament believe the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773?
    6·1 answer
  • Which is an example of an action that the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent? A. Parents search a child's bedroom for evid
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!