Could you elaborate on your question
These rights are often referred to as Miranda rights. The purpose of such notification is to preserve the admissibility of their statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
n the United States, the right to remain silent is designed to protect a person who is undergoing police questioning or trial. This right may help a person avoid making self-incriminating statements. This I believe would be the fifth amendment.
The Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination applies when an individual is called to testify in a legal proceeding.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger
In criminal cases, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination.
The South Africa of today has not attained "true freedom" because "true freedom" is the product of economic liberation and freedom of expression.
- This shows that what has been achieved in South Africa over the last 26 years has been mere political freedom.
- Yes, South Africans are free to choose their leaders through universal suffrage. However, the leaders that are so chosen have not extended this political freedom of choice to embrace economic liberation and freedom of expression for all South African citizens.
- Leadership after the great Nelson Mandela has remained for the self. Perhaps, this problem can be traced to lack of visionary leadership.
Thus, to end this ineptitude and guarantee South Africans the freedom they desire, there must be a change in national consciousness.
Read more about attaining true freedom in South Africa at brainly.com/question/17064424
<span>The structural element that is used in the excerpt by Anaya but not in the excerpt by Nye is D.logos. Logos is a rhetorical tool that is usually applied as appeal to logic and reason. The first excerpt sets its mood by representing events as they are, and there is a clear point of 'cause and effect': the information given by author is supported with reason. The second excerpt is a nice example of allusion irony, so it can be defined as literary anecdote.</span>
