1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
likoan [24]
3 years ago
8

List two ways the Declaration of Independence was an effective argumentative writing piece.

English
1 answer:
sineoko [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The reason why the Declaration of Independence is so persuasive is that Jefferson uses deductive arguments, which includes examples of Britain’s wrong doings, which gives the person reading the document a chance to see exactly why they are breaking from Great Britain.  One of the strongest deductive arguments in the declaration is, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men”.  This means that any legitimate government is created to protect peoples’ rights such as, “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”.  Throughout the declaration Jefferson shows how Great Britain is not protecting their rights, but interfering with them.  For example, he states how the king keeps sending over soldiers and expects the people to house and feed them.  How would you feel if the government just placed a stranger in your home and told you he could eat your hard-earned food?  These soldiers were also allowed to disobey the laws in the colonies and not be punished for them.  This is not what you call protecting peoples’ rights; it is more like invading them.  Another very strong deductive argument in this document is, “deriving their just power from the consent of the governed”.  This means any power or authority that a government has is given to them by the consent of the people, but this right like many others was abused too.  For instants, Jefferson wrote that they have “Petitioned for redress” repeatedly, meaning they sent many petitions to the king about many unfair problems in the colonies, wanting to come to some type of agreement.  Nevertheless, the king does not answer them but continues to hurt them.  This shows that the king did not care about the peoples’ consent; therefore, he is not implicating a just government and they have the right to break free from Great Britain.

You might be interested in
Consonant clusters can occur in different positions <br> False <br> Or true??
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is the tone of the passage “Just Be Yourself!”?
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

Where is the passage? This is impossible to help

6 0
3 years ago
When we arrived on scene (what we found)... YOU MUST WRITE ONLY THE FACTS! DO NOT INCLUDE OPINIONS! Use the points below to star
Lynna [10]

Answer:

The evidence supports / disproves Queenie's claim because... . Our conclusion / recommendations (the final CLAIM and what should happen next)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with this ELA question I will give you extra points and the brain thing 3
katovenus [111]
I want to say it’s Ethos but I’m not 100% sure!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the poem “The Man He Killed', why does the poet wish if he had met his
lora16 [44]

Answer:

"The Man He Killed" was written by the British Victorian poet and novelist Thomas Hardy, and first published in 1902. A dramatic monologue, the poem's speaker recounts having to kill a man in war with whom he had found himself "face to face." Talking casually throughout, the speaker discusses how this man could easily have been his friend, someone he might have, under different circumstances, had a drink with in an "ancient inn." Struggling to find a good reason for shooting the man, the speaker says it was "just so"—it was just what happens during war. The poem thus highlights the senselessness and wasteful tragedy of human conflict, and is specifically thought to have been inspired by the events of the Boer War in South Africa. Effect of war is the major theme of this poem. The poem is about the soldier killing another man because they are fighting on opposite fronts in the war. Ironically, the speaker fails to justify his action. He simply states that the deceased was his foe.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best explains how the experience of watching Kennedy speak is different from reading his words?
    9·1 answer
  • a story can be based entirely on an internal conflict ; there does not have to be an external conflict
    9·1 answer
  • One animal it’s very strong
    12·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    6·2 answers
  • What does a claim of value argue?
    14·2 answers
  • Process of drawing a conclusion on evidence is called
    15·2 answers
  • Study island setting answers
    12·1 answer
  • Wait can someone explain why im not Virtuoso when I have 5/5 brainliest and 599/500 points
    7·2 answers
  • Is this a run-on sentence?
    12·1 answer
  • A(n) _____ is the end or finish of a process.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!