Answer:
The geocentric model of the solar system has Earth at the center.
Explanation:
Throughout history, there have been multiple different models that humans thought of or created through observation. The two most famous ones from the past are the geocentric and heliocentric, with the geocentric coming earlier and for a very long time being the model that was accepted by the majority.
The geocentric model is a model that puts Earth in the center of the universe. Earth is presented as the most important and largest object in the universe. All of the space bodies, the Sun, stars, Moon, planets, were thought to revolve around Earth. As it turned out, this model was full of mistakes. Everything about it was wrong, with the only correct thing being that the Moon is actually revolving around Earth.
Answer and Explanation:
Sustainability is feasible with enhancements in innovation. Current advances make it conceivable to run feasible businesses, yet these are monetarily unfeasible because of our enormous vitality needs.The proficiency of current innovations in changing over vitality to progressively usable structures for example sun powered, wind,tidal and so forth are likewise low, mostly because of innovative boundaries, making huge scale maintainability unachievable,despite the accessibility of enough crude vitality to suit human needs. Consequently, we have the crude vitality lying around, we should simply change over it to a usable structure. Therefore, levels of progress at littler scales just as the nearness of crude vitality for enormous scale support ability are two reasons why manageability is reachable
As referenced above,the primary hindrance to accomplishing supportability is an absence of innovation to understand this. Another significant obstruction is the tremendous populace. A higher populace requests higher vitality, consequently, considerably more vitality should be delivered. At lower levels, manageability is all the more effectively come to even with our current innovative head ways. With a lower populace, while we may not accomplish manageability completely, we could at present bear to utilize assets in a progressively controlled way, and not deplete our current stores at a disturbing rate while we anticipate advancements in economical innovations.
One more boundary is our monetary framework which rewards snappy and quick generation over maintainable development, in this manner organizations will in general center around amplifying benefits instead of accomplishing supportability.
Well I do know that both Canada and the US have been working on saving animals and plants that live in the wild. I also know that threw these last 5 years we have been making over 14 natural parks a year in the US alone. Canada making less. Both country's want to save natural landscape and they think the best way to do so is natural parks.
Hope this helps! (:
I would think it is a technological monopoly.
