1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex17521 [72]
2 years ago
15

Have a journal of your communication activities for an entire day, making special note on all instances in which you tried to co

nfirm, persuade or argue with someone. choose one of those instances add prepare a brief analysis about it. in your analysis, answer the following questions:
a. who was the receiver of the message? b.what was the specific purpose of your message?
c. was the message rehearsed or arose spontaneously?
d. were you successful in achieving your purpose?
e. if face with the same situation again, what changes would you make to be a better communicator?​
English
1 answer:
Digiron [165]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.

The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.

Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic

You might be interested in
How long after the end of WWII was Manzanar closed?
DedPeter [7]
It officially closed November 21st, 1939. This was over 6 years after WWll had ended.
6 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLEASE - On Eduinity - 25 Points - Answer Quick - If Right I Will Mark Brainliest.
Elanso [62]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The reason why is because Most blogs are normally written in jounral's used to explain things such on different occasion's. EX: a fire starts, a newsropter rights down what he will blog and might send it to the news. On the other hand internet is just you writitng stuff in a box and then explaining what happened, when in real life you tlak to live aduince's and perform sort of

Hope this helps!

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you just saw a shooting star and wanted to write about the moment, which would be the best type of poem to write?
jek_recluse [69]
I would say maybe a narrative poem. If you want to capture the moment of when you saw a shooting star, then maybe you should tell it like a story but poem form.
5 0
3 years ago
This transition word or phrase shows position:
Karolina [17]
Afterward is the correct answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the effect of changing the story to present tense in the radio broadcast version?
Slav-nsk [51]

The correct answer is B. It makes the story feel like it is happening live rather than in the past

Explanation:

In literature, the tense used in a narrative affect the atmosphere of it and the perception the audience has on events. In the case presented an excerpt for The War of the Worlds has been adapted for radio and in this process, the tense has changed from past to present tense. In both cases, one character who is also the narrator describes the way he or she observed an object or creature that resembled a snake.

However, in the case of the original excerpt the use of past shows this event already occurred and the character is just reporting them, while in the case of the second excerpt the use of present means the character is experiencing the events at that moment or that the story is happening which makes the actions go faster but also makes the story more dynamic and alive. Considering this, it can be concluded the effect of changing the tense to present is that it makes the story feel like it is happening live rather than in the past.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read this excerpt from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. The most of my leisure time I spent in helping Master Daniel
    11·2 answers
  • 15 POINTS! WILL GIVE BRAINLY!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Select the sentence beginning with two adjectives.
    7·2 answers
  • I’ll mark brainliest:)<br> 14 points also
    11·2 answers
  • Help me please !!! I give the crown !!!​
    15·1 answer
  • For people that don't know or are new if your questions are being deleted It may be because it is not specific or it is not acad
    10·2 answers
  • Why does the author include a soliloquy in the play?
    11·2 answers
  • Read It!
    8·1 answer
  • At what point in the story does Milo’s world shift from reality to fantasy?
    7·1 answer
  • What does the reader learn about the Maasai people from "The Beginnings of the Maasai”? Check all that apply.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!