![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Your\;answer\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DYour%5C%3Banswer%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The last one, to begin negotiations to establish alliances and commerce with Britain.
___________________________________________________________
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Things\;straight\;from\;the\;paragraph\;to\;explain\;my\;answer.\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DThings%5C%3Bstraight%5C%3Bfrom%5C%3Bthe%5C%3Bparagraph%5C%3Bto%5C%3Bexplain%5C%3Bmy%5C%3Banswer.%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States
- Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.
The correct answer is A. She thinks that she is missing something exciting at home
Answer:
I think there are 2 Major workable actions; firstly, hire a Public Relations Firm and tell them what is needed to get across; meanwhile, those things that caused the idea of these “unfortunate stereotypes” should be quickly addressed; just how would depend on if the stereotype was real, or if the people who actually live their consider it a problem.
Explanation:
Answer:
Its - car
This - More and more physicians are beginning to look not just for illnesses but also for patients' habits with long-term health implications
Its - cow
Someone - no antecedent
It - antecedent not clear
Explanation:
The antecedent of a pronoun is the word or phrase whose place the pronoun takes. In some cases, the antecedent is obvious, while in others it's either missing or not clear.
In the first and third sentences, it's simple. In the first sentence, a car's transmission is mentioned. Instead of repeating the word <em>car</em>, we will use the pronoun<em> it</em> and its possessive form <em>its</em><em>.</em> It's the same in the third sentence (cow's tail - its tail).
The second example is interesting because the antecedent of the pronoun <em>this</em> is the entire previous sentence.
In the fourth sentence, the antecedent is missing. We don't know instead of what word the pronoun <em>someone</em> is used.
In the fifth, the antecedent is not clear as the pronoun <em>it </em>could be used to refer to the word <em>rain</em>, or the word <em>mud</em>.
