Answer: yes, Macbeth would have changed.
Explanation:
just not the way you think, his character would have developed, but even as a true person, Macbeth would have changed, he would have been given choices, and it seems that his wife was rather power hungry at first as well, i don't think he would have ended up as king, but I do firmly hold that his character would have changed, be it for worse or better, that parts up to you
The attitude connoted by the word <em>snicker </em>is condescending disrespect.
The word <em>snicker</em> is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as "to laugh in a covert or partly suppressed manner."
There is something false and dishonest about a snicker; it gives an impression of sarcasm, contempt, or mockery. It can be interpreted as disrespectful and condescending.
This could correspond to the eternal Footman's (death's) attitude because in this poem, Prufrock is expressing his fear of mortality and his feeling of not being important in the eyes of death.
Thank you. I guess one is a noun, the other one being a verb and the sentence is missing a verb
Answer:
Because he's a serial killer.He didnt have any personal vendetta against Sherlock. He was a serial killer and Sherlock was supposed to be his next victim.
Explanation:
