Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
Answer: Whenever I hear this kind of writing, I think of somebody writing in cursive, and being a bit showy with their hand writing, and making a point of taking their pencil away from the paper, making it seem like a whole show just for a pencil moving. Hope this helps! Brainliest please!
If your options are:
<span>A. It allowed future legislators to reword the constitution.
B. It allowed future legislators to abolish the constitution
C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution.
D. all of the above
I would say the answer is </span>C. It allowed future legislators to amend the constitution. This article basically says that the Constitution doesn't have to remain identical until the end of time (however perfect or adequate it is). It can be changed (amended) under certain conditions - if two thirds of the houses or a few states agree about it, they can call a convention and propose the changes they would like to make.
It really depends on the situation, the kind of relationship, and the person. are you happy in your relationship? or do you feel like being with this person is exhausting you? if someone came up to you and gave you a chance to leave, would you feel relief to be leaving the person? so yeah, it just depends on how much you want to be with them
