Answer:
D. There was no more frontier land
Explanation:
This is the answer because the 1890 census said that the frontier region of the United States no longer existed which means there was no more frontier land.
Hope this helps!
It’s true
She later assumed power over the kingdoms after the death of her father and brother, who both served as kings. This is just extra information
Hello XXGalaxyGirlXx.
Our first one will be <u>them wanting world peace.</u> They wanted peace within all environments. they wanted everyone to be the same, they wanted nobody getting hurt and everyone to be peaceful at all times. With that less crimes would happen and much more people could feel safe.
The second one <u>is preserving national security.</u> They wanted the hole United States to have national security. Although not everyone agreed, it made it hard for them to get that goal started as a group.
1st reason was that some people wanted to end slavery
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
