Answer:
I have got into the idea of giving you 2 paragraph they are as follows (you can choose any one)
Paragraph 1
A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. Most hazards are dormant or potential, with only a theoretical risk of harm; however once a hazard becomes “active”, it can create an emergency situation. A hazard does not exist when it is not happening. A hazardous situation that has come to pass is called an incident. Hazard and vulnerability interact together to create risk. (Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia information taken from internet)
An accident is caused by somebody’s action even if it was intended or unintended.
Paragraph 2
A hazard is caused by a particular set of circumstances which could be avoided or foreseen, hazards could become a threat or risk to health or life. Most hazards cause accidents – for example, in my nursery a girl was riding a scooter and accidently run into another child causing a big graze on the other child leg. This specific situation shows a typical accident, the accident was caused by her being excited and not careful in her actions. The girl was not aware of what her actions (driving fast on a scooter) can cause .
A verb that links ...be being been is am are was were have has had do did done can could shall should will would may might must.
The rhetorical appeal would be pathos because it is asking the audience to appeal to emotion
One statement that is an example of fallacious reasoning is:
- There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds.
<h3>What is fallacious reasoning?</h3>
Fallacious reasoning occurs if there are errors or inconsistencies in the reasoning, this might include errors of logic such as the reasons not supporting the claim or errors in the argument such as including irrelevant information.
<h3>What is one example of fallacious reasoning in "Remarks on East-West Relations at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin"?</h3>
One example of fallacious reasoning in this speech is:
- There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds
To support the idea of international cooperation.
This can be classified as fallacious reasoning because Ronald Reagan is trying to support the idea of international cooperation by appealing to feelings and emotions related to "hope for the future", which is not based on logic and is not valid.
Learn more about fallacious in: brainly.com/question/2515066