1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Evgesh-ka [11]
3 years ago
14

In which two ways does the structure of the passage influence the author's exposition of the whaling debate? Select all the corr

ect answers.
A The structure compares points from both sides in a neutral manner.
B The structure allows the author to show that both sides are flawed.
C The structure prevents the author from taking a neutral viewpoint.
D The structure shows that both sides raise valid points in the debate.
E The structure presents one side as more favorable to the audience.

Story
Whale Hunting

For thousands of years, man has hunted whales for food. Ambergris, a waxy material produced by some whales, has been valued as a perfume ingredient. In the 19th century, baleen, a bony substance that grows in the mouth of certain whales, was used to make ribs for umbrellas and stiffeners in ladies’ dresses. Other species of whales were prized for the valuable oil they yielded, and the demand for this oil almost led to the extinction of the sperm whale. Today, whaling is strictly regulated by the International Whaling Commission (IWC), but some environmental groups believe that all whale hunting should be banned.
Some of those who oppose whaling believe that it is wrong to hunt a group of animals to extinction just for food. They also think whale hunting is immoral because the methods used to kill whales are cruel and inflict intense suffering on the animals. Another reason opposers argue to ban whale hunting is that whales are mammals (like humans) and are one of the most intelligent animals.
Supporters of whale hunting claim that whales are not all the same and that some species of whales have increased in number in recent years. As an example, some note that one species, the minke whale, may number in the millions today. Whale-hunting advocates argue that quotas for the number of minke whales that can be hunted annually could be greatly increased without risking the whales’ extinction.
Those in favor of whale hunting are also quick to point out that pigs, which are also mammals, score higher than dogs, horses, and dolphins on some intelligence tests, yet pork is still eaten in many societies. Native peoples in Alaska and Siberia, where growing crops is not an option, rely on whale meat to feed themselves. These people and their ancestors have hunted whales since prehistoric times. According to commercial whalers, the high-tech harpoons used to kill whales do so quickly and with minimal suffering. The same cannot be said of the techniques used on commercial livestock and poultry, they claim.
There are two sides to the issue of whale hunting, each of which holds strong opinions as to why their viewpoint is correct and the opposing viewpoint is not. For every argument one side makes, the other side has a counter-argument, and this controversy is not likely to be resolved in the near future.
English
1 answer:
hammer [34]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The structure compares points from both sides in a neutral manner.

The structure shows that both sides raise valid points in the debate.

Explanation:

studyisland, just did it

You might be interested in
A big hazard on road paragrph writing
Alina [70]

Answer:

I have got into the idea of giving you 2 paragraph they are as follows (you can choose any one)

Paragraph 1

A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. Most hazards are dormant or potential, with only a theoretical risk of harm; however once a hazard becomes “active”, it can create an emergency situation. A hazard does not exist when it is not happening. A hazardous situation that has come to pass is called an incident. Hazard and vulnerability interact together to create risk. (Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia information taken from internet)

An accident is caused by somebody’s action even if it was intended or unintended.

Paragraph 2

A hazard is caused by a particular set of circumstances which could be avoided or foreseen, hazards could become a threat or risk to health or life. Most hazards cause accidents – for example, in my nursery a girl was riding a scooter and accidently run into another child causing a big graze on the other child leg. This specific situation shows a typical accident, the accident was caused by her being excited and not careful in her actions. The girl was not aware of what her actions (driving fast on a scooter) can cause .

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following reasons might make Bedford an unreliable narrator? Select all that apply.
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a linking verb?
adoni [48]
A verb that links ...be being been is am are was were have has had do did done can could shall should will would may might must.
3 0
4 years ago
Think of the sad looks on the children's faces if they can't
lyudmila [28]
The rhetorical appeal would be pathos because it is asking the audience to appeal to emotion
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP!! :))
VashaNatasha [74]

One statement that is an example of fallacious reasoning is:

  • There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds.

<h3>What is fallacious reasoning?</h3>

Fallacious reasoning occurs if there are errors or inconsistencies in the reasoning, this might include errors of logic such as the reasons not supporting the claim or errors in the argument such as including irrelevant information.

<h3>What is one example of fallacious reasoning in "Remarks on East-West Relations at the Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin"?</h3>

One example of fallacious reasoning in this speech is:

  • There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds

To support the idea of international cooperation.

This can be classified as fallacious reasoning because Ronald Reagan is trying to support the idea of international cooperation by appealing to feelings and emotions related to "hope for the future", which is not based on logic and is not valid.

Learn more about fallacious in: brainly.com/question/2515066

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do we know that “the party” referred to in the opening sentence
    6·1 answer
  • In which sentence does the capitalized word function as an adverb
    14·1 answer
  • Which piece of information is an example of something that should be paraphrased in an essay?
    5·1 answer
  • Highlight what happens to Cabeza de Vaca in paragraph 16.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following phrases from "Opening Ceremonies of the New York and Brooklyn Bridge" by Hon. Seth Low,
    8·2 answers
  • Polygon ABCD is dilated by a scale factor of 2 with the center of dilation at the origin to create polygon A′B′C′D′. If the endp
    14·1 answer
  • The bad news made Manuel fearful that his well-known infatuation for cheese—a passion he shared with his family—would incriminat
    8·2 answers
  • Connection to WORLD: What did this selection make you think of? **Movie/Song/Book/Meme/Image/Video/Story that relates and connec
    14·1 answer
  • The force of friction will always contribute to slowing down an object. 'true for false
    10·1 answer
  • What is a good summary for Wilderness in commonlit
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!