Could you live without social media? Why or why not? Explain your answer.

English

2 answers:

m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

depends on the person, on how reliant they are

Explanation:

so if they didnt use it in the first place they wont be

Kisachek [45]3 years ago

4 0

Probably not for a long time. Social media is something this generation grew up with, and became used to.

Social media IS something you CAN live without & many people do it. It’s not a need, when it comes to living. It is just a want. Social media has become the most popular way to get ahold of people, and get in contact with friends. Some people chose to walk away from social media for some time, to take a break even.

Yes, we all CAN live without it. However none of us want to.

You might be interested in

An appeal that uses sound logic is known as a)fact b)fallacy c)logos d)fallacious

Verizon [17]

Answer:

C - logos

Explanation:

Logos is a rhetorical strategy when you use logical arguments and evidence to state your point. Facts, fallacies, and fallacious doesn’t fit that definition very well.

4 0

3 years ago

Florence is inland, Venice is on a peninsula. Which of the following corrects the sentence? A. Florence and Venice: two cities i

Arturiano [62]

I think the correct answer would be C. The correct sentence would be that "Florence is inland, not Venice. It is on a peninsula." Option A would not be true based on the statement that was stated above. It was not saying anything about being a city of Italy. Option C would be correct as it compares the two places.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2 hours 17 minutes equals how many seconds?

castortr0y [4]

their are 822o sec in 2hr 17 min

6 0

3 years ago

Listen and read. Which T-shirt does the girl buy?

Gennadij [26K]

Answer:

blue