Answer:
1. Brian told Joe that he thinks he is a genius.
Explanation:
The revision that would best improve the original sentence is the first one.
In the second sentence, Joe is mentioned twice, which is not necessary and sounds somewhat awkward (despite making it a bit clearer whether Brian thinks that he himself or Joe is a genius).
In the third sentence, Joe is mentioned once, but in the second half of the sentence. That's why we could think that Brian told someone else that Joe is a genius.
The fourth sentence is the second best. The phrase <em>his friend</em>, though, doesn't contribute to the revision in any way, which makes it unnecessary.
That leaves us with the first option is the best one.
Answer:
The author was trying to convey the apathetic attitude of the rich towards the workingman.
Explanation:
The terms used by the author highlighted the negative ways the rich French class and the ruling class viewed the poor workingman. The term louts for example means an uncouth or aggressive person while the term Jack was used to describe the ordinary man who rendered services to the rich.
The author's use of these terms would help the reader to see how lowly the government thought of the poor to the extent that they failed to consider them and were taken unawares at the peasants' revolt.
Answer:
A texictual evidence is using specific words or phrases that helps the author to prove a statement
I think it’s True but i dunno
C. "Alice didn't dare to argue the point" shows that she does not wish to argue with the Queen, lest she upset her.
