A Venn Diagram has 3 parts. There are two sections that are used for the differences. The middle section is used for the similarities.
A venn diagram is used to compare and contrast two different ideas. To make a Venn Diagrm, you draw two circles which overlap. Each circle represents one of the topics you are comparing and contrasting. For example, one circle would represent apples and the other oranges. The overlapping section of the circles is for listing the similarities. In our example, one might find the words fruit, seeds, trees, Halloween, etc. The circle labaled apple might have the words red and green. The circle labeled orange might contain the words orange and sections.
I believe that writers are definitely justified in challenging the artistic status quo, because that's what true artists do. But to answer the question of why they do it, there are more answers. Think of Emily Dickinson, for example. She always strongly stood by her own freedoms and decisions to go against the current, and she's one of the most famous of American writers because of it. Aside from the fact she wanted to, going against the norm for writers often gives them more attention than if they wrote what was "expected" at the time. When studying famous American writers, we are often told to study things that they did differently than most, some, mostly the less notable today, only had minor differences, like they made their stories from different tenses, etc. But the most notorious used themes that may have been taboo and writing styles even more diverse. There is always the counter culture and most writers that we study belonged to it, sick of the large amount of similar, traditional stories that lacked element, or simply wanted to stand out.
Another reason could be that writers wanted to spread the written word to all different kinds of things that have yet to be written about, different characters that haven't yet been discovered. And there are the related reasons like how writers didn't even know they were writing for the public, only time tells, like with Ann Frank. She wasn't afraid to put opinions down on paper because it was her own personal journal but it had become a famous piece of literature because of the opinions.
I think writers break from tradition because the traditions are often not realistic and these artists are the only ones who will tell the truth, and that is why they do it, and that is why they are so important.
Answer:
O C. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must at that moment become the center of the universe.
Explanation:
Elie Wiesel was a Romanian author who survived the Holocaust and wrote about it in detail in his memoir Night. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986 for his contribution towards spreading awareness in his own struggle to comet o terms with his experiences in the concentration camps.
In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, he recounts how he has tried to come to terms with the young Jewish boy he was before the genocide that changed his perception of life forever. He also boldly stated,<em> "never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation"</em>. And in this fight for the rights of anyone irrespective of class, race, religion, and political feelings, implored on the world to <em>"take sides"</em> for in doing so, it means we have the courage to stand up for something rather than just be insensitive about it and remain neutral, which <em>"helps the oppressor, never the victim"</em>. And that will make the case of discrimination take center stage and be the main point of focus for remedy.
Thus, the <u>text that best represents the central point of the speech is option C.
</u>
success academy
Explanation:
its the school im in right now
