Answer:
The Great Compromise was a compromise between large states and small states on the formation of a new constitution.
Explanation:
After American independence the Articles of Confederation resulted in many challenges in the smooth functioning of the state, and a convention was called to discuss the fomation of a new constitution also known as the Constitutional Convention 1987. Two alternatives were proposed: first was the Virginia Plan, and second the New Jersey Plan. According to the Virginia Plan there would be three branches of government namely legislature, executive and judiciary. Legislature would consist of two houses: upper and lower. And representation in these houses would be based on population. On the other hand the New Jersey Plan also proposed three branches of government. It, however, called for a single house legislature with powers of trade and taxation with each state having one vote. Small states opposed Virginia Plan; Virginia was a large state. Whereas large states opposed the New Jersey Plan; New Jersey was a small state. In the final plan a compromise was reached also known as the Great Compromise. According to the final plan the legislature would consist of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state would have equal members in Senate; in the House of Representatives the member would be based on population. The money bill would originate from House of Representative; this satisfied the large states. This plan also served the interests of small states by giving them more seats in upper house than they could otherwise have.
Yes, it is true that historians believe that the time from prehistory to the development of agriculture spans more than two million years, since it is thought that humans first appeared on Earth roughly six millions years ago.
They it helpedto travel and justify theirselves
Answer:
gold and silver
Explanation:
Egypt get from Nubia through trade
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
Competition and inequality are necessary for human advancement.
Explanation: Andrew Carnegie was one of riches business man in USA during after 1800. He was the owner of the Carnegie steel and one of best seller of steel in the USA and around the world. He had $13.1 billion when he sold his business.
Besides,being a businessman he was a renowned philanthropist and business philosopher. In 1889, in an article titled "Gospel of Wealth" he mentioned about the Law of Competition which was written by himself. He said,"While the law may be sometimes hard for the individual, it is best for the race, because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department."
Though his statement, he tried to support his theory about law of Competition. Because he believed that competition makes the mentality to serve the best. When there is any inequality, it inspires someone to gain wealth and balance the rich poor difference.
So, according to the business philosophy of Carnegie " Competition and inequality are necessary for human advancement" describes his philosophy.
